UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT
От | peter pilsl |
---|---|
Тема | UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41C0A6A9.4080703@goldfisch.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I'd like to UNION two queries but the distinct-criteria for UNION should not be all columns in the queries, but only one. example. two tables: test=# select id,name from t1; id | name ----+------ 1 | bob 2 | mike (2 rows) test=# select id,name from t2; id | name ----+--------- 1 | bob 2 | mike j. (2 rows) # select id,name from t1 union select id,name from t2; id | name ----+--------- 1 | bob 2 | mike 2 | mike j. (3 rows) now I want a construct that returns me only one row for each id. If there are different names for that id's in the different tables, the name of t2 should be chosen. like: # select id,name from t1 UNION ON (id) AND SUPERMAGICPREFER (t2.name) select id,name from t2; id | name ----+--------- 1 | bob 2 | mike j. (2 rows) What is an appropriate approach to this? If I use my UNION-query as subquery for a SELECT DISTINCT ID, I loose the name, which is important. thnx. peter -- mag. peter pilsl goldfisch.at IT-management tel +43 699 1 3574035 fax +43 699 4 3574035 pilsl@goldfisch.at
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: