Re: production server down
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: production server down |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41C07369.6030405@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: production server down (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >> I don't trust it at all. So does that imply that I should override >> next transaction id and WAL starting address per the manpage? > > Yes, override everything there's a switch for. Also check that the > other values shown by pg_controldata look reasonable (the locale > settings are probably the only ones you might get burned on). OK >>> What if anything have you got in $PGDATA/pg_xlog? >> >> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 13 15:39 >> 0000016500000077 > > Um. That's so far from the values shown in pg_control that it's not > funny. > > This is 7.4, right? Correct. > I have a crude xlog dump tool that I'll send you off-list. We should > be able to identify the latest checkpoint in the existing XLOG files, > and that will give you something to work with. Thanks, Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: