Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace
От | Reini Urban |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41B48A16.4020105@x-ray.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace ("SehatRosny" <SehatRosny@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
SehatRosny schrieb: > Refering to 20 tables which can be partition > A. All departments tables is put into 20 tables. > some querying of 20 millions records. > > B. For each department create tablespace. (Which means, if there > are 7000 departments, there will be 7000 tablespace each contains > 20 tables). > A1. Use A option, > As tables become huge. partition the tables which hits often > and has large size file(usually when it bigger than 2-3 GB size) > into separate tablespace. > B1. Use B option, > Creating 7000 TableSpace for Departments > - One Department has one tablespace > - Each Department has 20 tables > Question : > 1. Is it B1 the right approach? > 2. Is progresql will have problems if I have 7000 tablespace? why tablespace at all? do some caclulation, buy a large disc and forget about tablespace. (i.e. symlinks) postgresql-cygwin certainly will have problems which such a configuration. Please use a decent operating system and filesystem for such a crazy idea. cygwin is certainly not suited well for such a production database. consider native windows or any unix instead. NTFS is certainly not suited well for > 500 files per dir. consider a unix filesystem instead. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: