Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41B37871.6060106@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >I think it would be reasonable to insist on >at least one concurrence ("looks ok to me") posted to pgsql-patches >before applying during late beta. We've gotten into a mode where >if you like a patch you say nothing, but I wonder whether we shouldn't >change that habit. > > > > Amen, brother! That would never be tolerated in any commercial setting that I am aware of, and should not be here either, IMNSHO. Silence does not mean consent, it is far more likely to mean that nobody had time to look it over.And if you commit it then surely you own it to some extent. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: