Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41B1D993.70303@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*) (Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/3/2004 4:12 PM, Mike Cox wrote: > Jan Wieck wrote: >> So how exactly do you think that big number of non-developer advanced >> PostgreSQL users will populate the comp.* groups? I don't see them there >> right now, and without them the comp.* groups are the wrong groups >> because you will not get answers to questions there. > > Look at this poll. > > http://scripts.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=36 The question is only about _an official newsgroup_. To contradict my statement above, the survey question would have to ask about _an official comp.* group NOT gated to the mailing lists_. And it would also have to point out who already said very clearly that and why they would stay on the mailing lists only. Interpreting this survey result as "a large number of experienced and advanced PostgreSQL users would consider to move to a newsgroup where their questions will not be read by Tom Lane, Stephen Szabo (and many other key players who said NO to this on the mailing list already)" is IMHO a too far strech. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: