Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41B0BBDB.8030008@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>>3) do add-ins count if they are completely externally hosted? > > > No. Sponsoring PostgreSQL means that the results of the effort become > part of PostgreSQL (the code, the documentation, the web site, the > advocacy effort, etc.). Merely producing software that works with > PostgreSQL does not "sponsor" PostgreSQL. I go back to my http://projects.postgresql.org argument. Your argument suggests that we do not list JDBC or .Net... Without the drivers PostgreSQL would be pretty useless. > I would be very careful about the hosting argument. Before you know it, > everyone who dumps some code on pgFoundry wants to be a sponsor because > his code is internally hosted. We really need a selection process of > recognized PostgreSQL software. Well.... all projects on pgFoundry are approved. It is not automatic. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake Then we might even include externally > hosted software. > > >>Since scrolling space on our web page is not exactly a scarce >>resource, I'm inclined to say "yes, yes, yes and no". It benefits >>*us* to list as many companies as possible, because it shows how >>widely used and supported PostgreSQL is to potential new users. > > > Then we should simply list everyone and be done with it. > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP. Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: