Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41AF4963.6080102@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
|
Список | pgsql-www |
>>> members{a} >> >> >> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion? >> >>> corporate{a} >> >> >> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My >> thoughts: >> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer; >> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3 >> versions. > > > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ... I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists? Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net provider? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: