Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41ACFF96.6090501@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Well, I'm not going to defend the spec, as it's broken in a few places. However there is no setTimestamp without timezone. Dave Tom Lane wrote: >Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: > > >>Kris Jurka wrote: >> >> >>>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dave Cramer wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Since timestamp without timezone is a postgresql extension >>>> >>>> >>>This is not true. >>> >>> >>> >>Well, one of them must be an extension so it is timestampz ? >> >> > >timestamp with and without timezone are both required by the SQL >standard. If JDBC only supports one of them I'd think the JDBC >spec is a tad broken. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend > > > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: