Re: Postgres vs. MySQL
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vs. MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41A5D23F.3020705@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vs. MySQL ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I did some work on RT wrt Postgres for a company and found that their was lots of room for improvement particularly if you are linking requests. The latest RT code hopefully has fixes as a result of this work. Dave Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:57:52AM -0500, Christian Fowler wrote: > > >>As for performance, lots of others will probably volunteer tips and >>techniques. In my experience, properly written and tuned applications will >>show only minor speed differences. I have seen several open-source apps >>that "support postgres" but are not well tested on it. Query optimization >>can cause orders of magnitude performance differences. >> >> > >Definitely. My favourite is Request Tracker (we use 2.x, although 3.x is the >latest version), which used something like 5-600 queries (all seqscans since >the database schema only had an ordinary index on the varchar fields in >question, and the queries were automatically searching on LOWER(field) to >emulate MySQL's case-insensitivity on varchar fields) for _every_ page shown. >Needless to say, the web interface was dog slow -- some index manipulation >and a few bugfixes (they had some kind of cache layer which would eliminate >98% of the queries, but for some reason was broken for non-MySQL databases) >later, and we were down to 3-4 index scans, a few orders of magnitude faster. >:-) > >/* Steinar */ > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: