Re: Using PostgreSQL As A Personal Database
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using PostgreSQL As A Personal Database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41A25505.8020109@3times25.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using PostgreSQL As A Personal Database (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 14:55:50 -0500, > Jeff Flowers <duckfoo@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >>So my question is: how much data needs to be stored before PostgreSQL is >>worth the effort? Also, do people even use PostgreSQL at home for >>personal, non-weblog stuff? > > > The amount of data isn't the main consideration. Postgres would be useful > if you wanted to have queries about you comic books use an index or if > there was some data about them that had rules you wanted enforced. > > I would think it would be overkill to use postgres if you are just > occasionally adding the names to the list and will just want the whole > list if there is an accident. That kind of collection, I suspect it would be nice to sort by: title, date, value, So I would suspect putting them into a database would prove to be quite useful. I've cataloged my toothpick collection in this way. -- Until later, Geoffrey
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: