Re: Emacs vs Vi (Was: Re: PostgreSQL in the press
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Emacs vs Vi (Was: Re: PostgreSQL in the press |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 419B867A.8080903@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Emacs vs Vi (Was: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again) ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Since the history on this was cut off, I would just like to remind > everyone that it was Josh Berkus' idea to start a thread on emacs vs vi > (altho, of course, he did suggest it "tongue in cheek" ... the rest of > us just had to jump onto the bandwagon *grin*) ... Noted ;) > between them, compiling without exiting the editor ... one thing that it > did do nicely was that if you compiled inside of the editor, the > 'errors' linked to the actual code itself, so you could jump right to it > ... > > Between screen and X though, vi uses less resources, and other then the > 'jumping to the buggy code' feature, the rest can be easily duplicated ... I like joe which has wordstar type key bindings and is modeless. You can do the whole multi-screen,buffer deal as well. I also know vi but will use joe anytime I can :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP. Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: