Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4197AC96.5050500@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Christopher Browne wrote: > I'd expect a C++-based system to fall somewhere in between. Between > exception handling, templates, and such, C++ adds a bit of "gratuitous > bloat," but not quite so much as in Java. (Unless you use STL Way > Lots, but that's another story :-).) The only think that STL bloat is the "code" and not always ( like all templates ). Having say that I largelly accept a code bloath of few hundreads bytes instead of reinvent the well each time you need a list, or you shall implement a sort. I'm sad to see however people talking or writing about C++ performances or memory requirements without even have write a single line of C++ code. Alway in situation like this I to read a couple of book or article about templates: "Modern C++ Design: Generic Programming and Design Patterns Applied " and most of all the capabilities of this library: http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/multi_index/doc/index.html May be I had an over reaction ( excuse me ) but this week is not the first ( also out of this list ) talking against C++. Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: