Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design

I'm not talking about opening it to input and design suggestions, i'm
talking about a vote:

A if you like the design at url1
B if you like the design at url2

Not open ended, not allowing for people to say "yeah but do this or do that"

Gavin

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
>>
>>> Sorry, but the site has goals of things it needs to accomplish and that
>>> goes beyond "looking cool". I've worked in usability and information
>>> architecture and know the things that need to be accomplished with an
>>> organizations main website and if you leave it up to the general public
>>> your looking for trouble.
>>> Robert Treat
>>>
>> Appearance and usability are both important factors.  Are you saying
>> that people outside of -www are not capable of judging both?
>
>
> The wider the audience, the harder it becomes to come to a consensus
> ... those that are interested in the web site developments have/should
> join the -www list, just like you did, and put in their 2 cents ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ:
> 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match