Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>We have the following warning on Windows:
>>pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep'
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be
>><stdlib.h> in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the call by a
>>call to pg_usleep().
>>
>>
>
><stdlib.h> is included automatically by c.h, so that surely won't fix it.
>
>
Now I look closer I see that it declares _sleep() rather than sleep().
>I have some recollection that we invented pg_usleep in part because we
>wanted to not use sleep() at all in the backend, but I don't recall why
>(and the reasoning might not apply to the archiver process, anyway).
>
>
>
>
I thought we invented pg_usleep so we could remove the calls to
select(0,NULL,NULL,NULL,timeout) which don't work on Windows.
cheers
andrew