Re: Compiling PostgreSQL 8.1.5 with 64-bit on a G5 SOLVED
От | Brian Wipf |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compiling PostgreSQL 8.1.5 with 64-bit on a G5 SOLVED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 418CDBAD-CF9C-4A87-BB68-8DEF5F2912E0@clickspace.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Compiling PostgreSQL 8.1.5 with 64-bit on a G5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Compiling PostgreSQL 8.1.5 with 64-bit on a G5 SOLVED
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
Thanks for your help, Tom! I applied that patch to s_lock.h in our PostgreSQL 8.1.5 source, and the 64-bit compile went through without a hitch. On 27-Nov-06, at 5:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com> writes: >> Removing -mcpu=970 got rid of the #define bool bool, among other >> things, which allowed the configure to go through without modifying >> any code. The make still fails with what looks like identical errors. > >> ../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h:806:2: error: #error >> PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this platform. To >> continue the compilation, rerun configure using --disable-spinlocks. >> However, performance will be poor. Please report this to pgsql- >> bugs@postgresql.org. > > Ah. For that you need this patch: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-04/msg00217.php > which is in HEAD (8.2) but not any older branch. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: