Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 418B9FD2.2090607@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: > >>I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this >>discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use >>the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we >>need to change I'll take lots more notice. > > > I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain > traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB > backend that it uses. > > I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer > subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups > and also our system administrators could get some experience with it. I good very start point is see if cvs2svn can handle the postgresql CVS without errors. Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: