Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 418A9E21.6030709@mailblocks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check ...) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom, > (I'm rather interested to know whether any other SCMs have a better > solution to this problem, and if so what it is. It's not obvious how > to do better.) > I've been working with a few SCM's and IMHO only one of them really handles this really well. That's ClearCase. I'm well aware that ClearCase is not an option but I though it could still be interesting to know how this can be managed when done right. In ClearCase everything (both files and directories) are "elements". A directory is a version of an element and it contains versions of other elements. It's not very different from Unix and I-nodes although everything is of course versioned. Subversion claims they handle moves pretty well. When I checked it out, it turns out that a move is a copy (versions and all) followed by a delete, thus maintaining version history at both locations. I'd recommend anyone who think CVS is insufficient due to file moves to investigate subversion. Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: