Re: Restricting Postgres
От | Martin Foster |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restricting Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 418A2BE2.70609@ethereal-realms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Restricting Postgres (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Simon Riggs wrote > > > All workloads are not created equally, so mixing them can be tricky. > This will be better in 8.0 because seq scans don't spoil the cache. > > Apache is effectively able to segregate the workloads because each > workload is "in a directory". SQL isn't stored anywhere for PostgreSQL > to say "just those ones please", so defining which statements are in > which workload is the tricky part. > > PostgreSQL workload management could look at userid, tables, processor > load (?) and estimated cost to decide what to do. > > There is a TODO item on limiting numbers of connections per > userid/group, in addition to the max number of sessions per server. > > Perhaps the easiest way would be to have the Apache workloads segregated > by PostgreSQL userid, then limit connections to each. > Apache has a global setting for load average limits, the above was just a module which extended the capability. It might also make sense to have limitations set on schema's which can be used in a similar way to Apache directories. While for most people the database protecting itself against a sudden surge of high traffic would be undesirable. It can help those who run dynamically driven sites and get slammed by Slashdot for example. Martin Foster Creator/Designer Ethereal Realms martin@ethereal-realms.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: