Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4183F64B.2000007@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/30/2004 3:39 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> >>> Replication is one subsystem not included in source tree. But PostgreSQL >>> has other subsystems that are included such as plugins for procedural >>> languages. So isn't the same risks involved with them? >>> >> >> No, not really. Because items such as plPerl don't require >> changes to the backend. Replication requires changes to the backend. > > Replication doesn't require changes to the backend ... neither eRServer or > Slony-I do, at least ... Slony-II will probably need some additional features. But I consider it a sign for an immature design not to be able to define those features in form of an API and instead starting to hack together a prototype inside of the backend that later down the road will get promoted to a solution because there never will be any time to turn the findings of that explore-phase into a design and develop according to that. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: