Re: Why is Gborg still listed?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is Gborg still listed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4183D468.30309@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is Gborg still listed? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is Gborg still listed?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> > Its not the project admin's that is at issue ... if you would like to > become one of the PgFoundry admin, please talk to Josh Berkus about > it, but right now, its on the 'PgFoundry' side that the bottleneck is > ... unless, of course, you are advocating scrapping/deleting off the > trouble tickets and such on the gborg project side, and having each > project start from scratch? > Of course not :) That was the point of the Read only access. No loss of data, but requires movement to the new projects.postgresql.org. You could even have a a projects.postgresql.org/old that brings up the old gborg site if you want. > Not 100% certain what your problem is though ... ppl are visiting both > sites, and finding what they are looking for ... is there a specific > reason you feel that there is a panic to move ppl from GBorg -> > PgFoundry? Well my problem is: 1. Lack of consistency. 2. Large amounts of traffic being pushed to the "old" site via multiple places on the www site. 3. The slow migration :). I am not blaming anyone, just trying to get things moving. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: