Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4182.1006708422@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>) |
Ответы |
Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector
Re: Security note: MS SQL is current worm vector |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my> writes: > Yeah, by default Postgresql ships practically without any access controls. It ain't *that* bad. The default configuration is "no remote access, period", even if you give -i in the postmaster switches. True, there are no local access controls by default, but unless someone ignores the instructions and runs the postmaster as "bin" or another quasi-privileged user, there's no way I can see to use the database to break into root. (Barring site security holes, which could be exploited by any local user anyway.) MS SQL's problem is that any remote attacker who can reach the machine by TCP is instantly root, or whatever the equivalent concept is on NT. If you don't have the server port firewalled you're a sitting duck. I do wonder whether we shouldn't list "think about your access controls" as an explicit step in the installation instructions or server startup instructions. The default configuration is definitely uncool on multiuser machines, but a novice might not find that out till too late. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: