Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Hi,

Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> I just can't see that the website for a database is so
> special that it requires a ground-up approach of cobbled-together
> libraries and proprietary code.

The code is under BSD license and it uses several PEAR packages, not
"cobbled-together libraries". You know what PEAR is, eh?

> I would love to help out, but after a couple weeks of reading the
> threads I'm not sure how to help, or if it is really welcome.  Who is
> in charge, what is the plan, and how can I (realistically) help?

You are currently not offering help. You are cheerleading for your
particular CMS. Reality check: will you still be ready to help if we
don't standartize on your particular Nuke clone? Are you actually aware
of the website requirements?