Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be deferrable?
| От | Mike Mascari |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be deferrable? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 417E5F4A.7030001@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be
Re: Any plans on allowing user-defined triggers to be |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Mike Mascari wrote: > > >>I'd like to ensure that the creation of a department also implies the >>creation of two to eight projects; no more, no less: >>Is there no way to achieve the above stated goal in the server? Must I >>rely on the application to enforce consistency? > > > Well. It's not exactly meant to be a user facing feature, but check out > CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER. Thanks, Stephan! I read the disclaimer "It is not intended for general use" but am curious as to why it isn't a user-facing feature? Is it a function of just exposing a cleaner SQL interface, or is it a function of the trigger queue having been written after user-defined triggers, or is there some philosophical argument against allowing user-definable triggers to be deferred? At any rate, it looks like precisely what I need. Thanks! Mike Mascari
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: