Re: portal code changes
От | Alexey Borzov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: portal code changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41775277.2060508@cs.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: portal code changes (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: portal code changes
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Hi, Robert Treat wrote: >>Well, as Magnus already pointed out, I just renamed "About" to "Overview". >>I don't see the point of splitting it into "About" and "Using" --- we don't >>yet have enough content to justify any splits. Some of the stuff should >>probably end in the "documentation" section alongside the official docs, >>though. > > The difference in the two sections is that one is to keep advocacy oriented > material... stuff the someone who is trying to determine if postgresql is > good for them would need to know. The other section is aimed more at people > who use postgresql everyday, or need to explore deeper into the different > options they have with postgresql. Hey, *you* know anout the difference between "advocacy-oriented" and "user-oriented" content. But will the website users know it? That's the question you need to answer first. If there is no difference for them then there is no need to split. >>You tell me what do you mean by "splitting", I tell you how feasible this >>is... > > I mean listing "regular" events seperate from "training" events, sort of like > we have news seperate from events now. OK, I could understand *that*. ;) But *how* do you think they should be split: in display, in submit form, in admin interface, etc.?
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: