Re: table size/record limit
От | Dennis Gearon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: table size/record limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41774A62.4000508@fireserve.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: table size/record limit (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: table size/record limit
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Google probably is much bigger, and on mainframes, and probably Oracle or DB2. But the table I am worried about is the one sized >= 3.6 GIGA records. Tino Wildenhain wrote: > Hi, > > Am Do, den 21.10.2004 schrieb Dennis Gearon um 1:30: > >>I am designing something that may be the size of yahoo, google, ebay, etc. >> >>Just ONE many to many table could possibly have the following >>characteristics: >> >> 3,600,000,000 records >> each record is 9 fields of INT4/DATE >> >>Other tables will have about 5 million records of about the same size. >> >>There are lots of scenarios here to lessson this. >> >>BUT, is postgres on linux, maybe necessarily a 64 bit system, cabable of >>this? And there'd be 4-5 indexes on that table. > > > Sure. Why not? 3...5mio records is not really a problem. > We had bigger tables with historic commercial transactions > (even on an old dual PIII/1000) with fine performance. > I bet however, yahoo, google at least are much bigger :-) > > Regards > Tino > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: