Re: how much mem to give postgres?
От | Matt Clark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: how much mem to give postgres? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4176AB72.6040101@ymogen.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: how much mem to give postgres? (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: how much mem to give postgres?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
><OT> >Hyperthreading is actually an excellent architectural feature that >can give significant performance gains when implemented well and used >for an appropriate workload under a decently HT aware OS. > >IMO, typical RDBMS streams are not an obviously appropriate workload, >Intel didn't implement it particularly well and I don't think there >are any OSes that support it particularly well. ></OT> > >But don't write off using it in the future, when it's been improved >at both the OS and the silicon levels. > > > You are quite right of course - unfortunately the current Intel implementation meets nearly none of these criteria! As Rod Taylor pointed out off-list, IBM's SMT implementation on the Power5 is vastly superior. Though he's also just told me that Sun is beating IBM on price/performance for his workload, so who knows how reliable a chap he is... ;-) M
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: