Re: NIC to NIC connection
От | Matt Clark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NIC to NIC connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41759198.4070505@ymogen.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NIC to NIC connection (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: NIC to NIC connection
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
>Switches are not security devices. While it is harder to sniff packets on >switches, you can't count on them to prevent hostile machines on the >switch from playing games with the arp protocol. Also I believe that if >a switch doesn't remember where a particular mac address is it will send >the packet to all of the attached ports. > > If you have 6 app servers it's just daft to stick 6 NICs in your DB server. If absolute privacy is a concern (not mentioned by the OP), then use a dedicated switch (or switches) for the 'private' subnet. Even better, use SSH. But all this is over the top for 99.9% of uses anyway. A VLAN is as private as anything else, so you can just create a VLAN on your current switch fabric and use that. No kind of traffic on a VLAN will hit any other VLAN. Unless of course someone has hacked your switch, set up a mirror port, attached a sniffer or other hacked machine to it, and is assiduously reading your traffic, in which case you have bigger problems.... M
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: