Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Hi,

On 3/30/17 2:12 PM, Daniel Verite wrote:
>     Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
>
>> Hmm, With batch mode, after sending COPY command to server(and server
>> started processing the query and goes into COPY state) , client does not
>> immediately read the result , but it keeps sending other queries to the
>> server. By this time, server already encountered the error
>> scenario(Receiving different message during COPY state) and sent error
>> messages
>
> IOW, the test intentionally violates the protocol and then all goes wonky
> because of that.
> That's why I was wondering upthread what's it's supposed to test.
> I mean, regression tests are meant to warn against a desirable behavior
> being unknowingly changed by new code into an undesirable behavior.
> Here we have the undesirable behavior to start with.
> What kind of regression could we fear from that?

The CF has been extended until April 7 but time is still growing short. 
Please respond with a new patch by 2017-04-04 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this 
submission will be marked "Returned with Feedback".

Thanks,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net