Re: tightening up on use of oid 0

Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
>>Executing "SELECT foo(?)" via PreparedStatement will work fine if you
>>pass a non-null PGline or PGbox argument to setObject, but if you try to
>>setNull() then you will get ambiguity between the two functions at
>>execution time.
>>
>>I can't see a way to fix this without a postgresql extension of some
>>sort. Options I can think of are:
>
>
> Can't the existing PGobject interface handle this.  You can create a
> PGobject with the correct datatype and a null value and that should work.

OK, so getValue() and toString() return null?

This would still mean that setNull() would not work for Types.OTHER, though.

-O