Re: [NOVICE] Conditional Relationships?
От | Ron St-Pierre |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [NOVICE] Conditional Relationships? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4165789F.1030701@syscor.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
John Browne wrote: >Ok, I'm designing a new database for work, and I have run across a >situation where a "conditional relationship" makes sense. Here is a >*simplified* example of what I'm talking about: > >tb_address_data_us >address_id >addr1 >addr2 >city >state >zip_code > >tb_address_data_ca >address_id >addr1 >addr2 >city >province >postal_code > >tb_offices >office_id >manager_name >date_opened > >tb_addresses_2_offices >office_id >country_id >address_data_id > > >As you can see, the "link" table is tb_addresses_2_offices. This >model makes it easy to add additional address templates in the future, >just by adding a single data table for the new country. But, it means >the address_data_id can point to an id in any of the address data >tables. I've done some reading, and some say it's fairly common to >see this type of model. Others say it breaks database normalization >rules. > >My question is, how often do you guys see this in "real-world" >scenarios? Obviously, it makes things like foreign key constraints >difficult to use.. > >Thoughts? > Okay, these address/office entries are for a company/customer/user/etc (I'll call it a user). Can each user have multiple addresses (and vice-versa)? Can each address have multiple offices? Once you let us know this it will be easier to answer. Ron
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: