Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
От | Dave Byrne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41643DEB39E4DA4EB6A7AF4A8C9F88BB7E71B887@mdb-mail2kX.MDBCapital.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they are lingering around. It works for 9.0-> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in versionsprior to 9.0 an additional check will have to be added. Thanks Dave Byrne -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM To: Dave Byrne Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bruce Momjian Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com> writes: > Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d > pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current > database with the message 'old and new databases "postgres" have a > different number of relations' > On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade checks that the number of > relations are the same but includes orphaned temp tables in the comparison. > Is this expected behavior? Seems like an oversight. regards, tom lane
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: