Re: VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41618896.4010404@mbigroup.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: | Gaetano Mendola wrote: | |> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: |> |>> Since you are running autovacuum I doubt the doing vacuumdb -a -z is 3 |>> times a day buying you much. It's not a bad idea to do once in a while. |> |> |> |> The reason is that I have few tables of about 5 milion with ~ 10000 |> insert per |> day. Even with setting -v 300 -V 0.1 this means these tables will be |> analyzed |> each 50 days. So I have to force it. | | | I understand, but 10,000 new rows increate your table size only 0.2%, so | it won't significantly effect anything. Also, if they really are just | inserts then vacuum is totally unnecessary. I agree that for these | situations pg_autovacuum should be supplemented by vacuumdb -a -z every | once in a while, all I was pointing out was that 3 times a day is | probably excessive. Right, but the table collect logs, so is mandatory have the statistics up-to-date in order to obtain index scan for queries that are involving the last 24 hours. For the vacuum vs the analyze I do vacuum because other tables are not in this category of "only update" so instead of write tons of line in my crontab I prefer only one line. Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBYYiV7UpzwH2SGd4RAiglAKDpPvuhEZSabwXVBJzcCezH8fYIJQCfW9UY CUkHUisIuJsbJHU5W0g0FhI= =u6Xz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: