Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4161.1322701822@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and
changing GUCs
Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > SQL: > set datestyle to postgres,us; > prepare stmt as select '02-01-2011'::date::text; > execute stmt; > set datestyle to postgres,euro; > execute stmt; > deallocate stmt; > The results I get with normal debug compilation are: > SET > PREPARE > text > ------------ > 02-01-2011 > (1 row) > SET > text > ------------ > 01-02-2011 > (1 row) > DEALLOCATE The result of parse analysis for that query is a stored date constant (in a Const node) with a cast-to-text on top of it. The system is aware that cast-date-to-text isn't immutable, so it doesn't try to fold the cast operation. When you execute the query, it displays the date constant using the now-current datestyle. > But with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, I get: > SET > PREPARE > text > ------------ > 02-01-2011 > (1 row) > SET > text > ------------ > 02-01-2011 > (1 row) > DEALLOCATE > Which one of those results is correct? I believe what is happening in the second case is that the query is getting re-parse-analyzed, from scratch, and since now datestyle is different (DMY not MDY), the date literal gets interpreted differently. You could argue it either way as to which result is "more correct", but I doubt we're going to try to do something about that. Best advice is to avoid ambiguous input, or if you can't, at least avoid flipping your datestyle on the fly. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: