Re: [HACKERS] Odd listen_addresses behavior
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Odd listen_addresses behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4153.1489607873@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Odd listen_addresses behavior ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Odd listen_addresses behavior
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > jd@jd-wks:~/snap/postgresql96/common$ grep listen_addresses > data/postgresql.conf > listen_addresses = '192*' # what IP address(es) to listen on; > -- I wasn't actually expecting the above to work. I was just testing. Fails as expected for me: $ postgres --listen-addresses='192*' 2017-03-15 15:50:11.024 EDT [3852] LOG: could not translate host name "192*", service "5432" to address: Name or servicenot known 2017-03-15 15:50:11.024 EDT [3852] WARNING: could not create listen socket for "192*" 2017-03-15 15:50:11.024 EDT [3852] FATAL: could not create any TCP/IP sockets 2017-03-15 15:50:11.024 EDT [3852] LOG: database system is shut down > postgres=# show listen_addresses ; > listen_addresses > ------------------ > * > (1 row) I'm suspicious that you have an override of listen_addresses somewhere --- for instance, the "-i" postmaster command line switch effectively is --listen-addresses='*'. Even if you had a version of getnameinfo() that failed to complain about '192*', that would not cause the recorded value of the string GUC to silently transmogrify into something else. You might look into pg_settings to see where it says that value of listen_addresses came from. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: