Re: disk performance benchmarks
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disk performance benchmarks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41479FA1.1080001@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disk performance benchmarks ("Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: disk performance benchmarks
|
Список | pgsql-general |
>You can see there's not much progress being made there. In the >presence of a farily pathetic writeout, there's a tiny trickle of disk >reads, userspace isn't making any progress, the kernel isn't busy, and >few processes are in iowait. So what the heck is going on? > >This state of non-progress persists as long as the checkpoint subprocess >is active. I'm sure there's some magic way to improve this but I >haven't found it yet. > > > Hello, It is my experience that RAID 5 is not that great for heavy write situations and that RAID 10 is better. Also as you are on linux you may want to take a look at what file system you are using. EXT3 for example is known to be stable, if a very slow piggy. J >PS this is with Linux 2.6.7. > >Regards, >jwb > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: