Re: x86_64 configure problem
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: x86_64 configure problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41437700.1080101@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: x86_64 configure problem (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: x86_64 configure problem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote: > Gaetano Mendola wrote: > >> Joe Conway wrote: >> >>> I wasn't going to -- python's own docs say I shouldn't need to. From >>> the link above: >>> >>> "the Distutils work just fine with Python 1.5.2, and it is reasonable >>> (and expected to become commonplace) to expect users of Python 1.5.2 >>> to download and install the Distutils separately before they can >>> install your modules" >> >> >> I'm not native english speakers but that sentence above doesn't imply >> Python 1.5.2 => Distutils. So instead of an error like this: >> >> checking Python installation directories... Traceback (innermost last): >> File "<string>", line 1, in ? >> ImportError: No module named distutils >> Traceback (innermost last): >> File "<string>", line 1, in ? >> ImportError: No module named distutils >> /usr/ >> checking how to link an embedded Python application... no >> configure: error: Python Makefile not found >> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56347 (%build) >> >> is better have: >> >> Error: you need to have Distutil installed > > > Perhaps. The first error message seems clear enough to me, but if you > want to send me the necessary distutils test, I can incorporate it. Any > other opinions out there? python -c "from distutils import *" > /dev/null 2>&1 || (echo "You need distutils installed"; exit 1) Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: