Re: Tsearch2 update for Win32.
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tsearch2 update for Win32. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 413F3094.8020800@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tsearch2 update for Win32. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: >"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > > >>>Oh. Hmm ... wouldn't it be easier and safer to launch "psql <script" >>>as a subprocess? >>> >>> > > > >>I'd say no. Executing processes from the installer environment can be a >>headache (we've had enough problems with initdb already..). And you have >>to go through all the weirdness with the commandline quoting etc on >>win32... It's a lot easier to execute a SQL script line-by-line. Which >>also lets us trap the errors easier etc. >> >> > >I was about to mention trapping errors as being a likely weak spot of >custom-script-execution code. And have you duplicated psql's rather >extensive logic for determining where SQL commands end? I'll get a bit >annoyed if you come back later and tell us not to use dollar quoting >in contrib scripts, or something like that. > >However, the COPY->INSERT change alone is below my threshold of pain, >so I won't complain too hard. I just wanted to be sure you'd really >thought about the implications of rolling your own script executor. > > > > Not to mention someone putting a \ command in the install script. I understand the difficulties, but ISTM that getting "psql -f scriptfile" working could be a Good Thing (tm). OTOH, should the installer be running the contrib install scripts, or should this be left as a job for the administrator? Maybe we're trying to do too much. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: