Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4136ffa0905291716v76be340fye2714aeb22870de0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote: > On May 29, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> a) the ability to "push" a schema onto the current search path >> b) the ability to "pull" a schema off the current search path > > push, pop, shift, unshift. :-) > > Come to think of it, I want these for arrays, too. ;-) push and unshift sure -- and you do have those for arrays, it's spelled ||. I'm not so sure about pop/shift though. How would you know the element you want is at the beginning/end unless you just put it there? I think what you really want is to use SET LOCAL or RESET to restore it to whatever it was before you started futzing with it. We might need a more flexible way to do that that isn't tied to transactions though. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: