Re: Saner interval hash function
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Saner interval hash function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4136ffa0904040712s57d4c8b3u93151438ed1f4985@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Saner interval hash function (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Saner interval hash function
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The present implementation of interval_hash() is very carefully designed > and coded ... to meet the wrong specification :-(. What it should > be doing is producing equal hashcodes for values that interval_eq() > considers equal. The error is exhibited in the recent bug report #4748. It would be nice if we had a way to generate a lot of similar values for a every data type. Then we could have a regression test which checks for each data type that the hash function matches the equality operator -- and for that matter that the various inequality operators are also consistent. I'm not sure how to generate values though. For a lot of data types it would be hard to generate values densely enough to trigger any bugs. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: