Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4136ffa0809080618v1d63a4f4m474c65ec8f999b0f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > But of course case insensitivity isn't going to fix that example for you. > So we're right back at the question of where we should draw the line in > trying to accept variant input. Well it's not a perfect precedent but for example, dd accepts: G (2^30) M (2^20) k (2^10) K (2^10) Kb (10^3) MB (10^6) GB (10^9) b (512) I think we're all agreed we want to ignore the KiB crap and make all our units base 2. And I don't think usin "b" for block makes sense for us. But the point is that yes, people expect to type "100M" or "1G" and have that work. Plenty of us do it all the time with dd or other tools already. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: