Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session
Дата
Msg-id 413321d8f23123f9033c2d9a06c19dbec12864fa.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Request for comment on setting binary format output per session  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 09:13 -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd like to open up this discussion again so that we can
> move forward. I prefer the GUC as it is relatively simple and as
> Peter mentioned it works, but I'm not married to the idea. 

It's not very friendly to extensions, where the types are not
guaranteed to have stable OIDs. Did you consider any proposals that
work with type names?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joseph Koshakow
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: zstd compression for pg_dump