Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name?
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4129BBB5-0AB3-44D2-8125-52B673EA1FCF@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name? (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
OLAPWindow? Gives a clue what meaning of "window" it's referring to... -- Greg On 20 Dec 2008, at 03:13, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com > wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm looking at the window-functions patch and wondering just what >> kind >> of trouble we'll get into if we leave its new plan node type named >> just >> "Window". I've already confirmed that this is a direct conflict >> against >> a typedef in <X11/X.h>, and I'd be not the least bit surprised if >> it's >> used in even-more-popular system headers on Windows or Darwin. Now >> maybe you could always get away with not including such headers >> together >> with plannodes.h, but it sure looks like problems waiting to happen. >> So I'm thinking we'd better rename it, but I'm not coming up with >> anything good; the best I can do after a long day is "EvalWindow", >> and that doesn't seem particularly inspired. Any suggestions? > > EvalWindow sounds like a function in src/backend/executor/. > > WindowAgg? > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: