Re: using an index worst performances

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rod Taylor wrote:

|>>What are the times without the index, with the index and with the higher
|>>statistics value when using a prepared query?
|>
|>Using a prepared query:
|>
|>Without index and default stat 10 :    1.12 ms
|>Without index and default stat 1000 :  1.25 ms
|>With index and default stat 10:        1.35 ms
|>With index and default stat 1000:      1.6 ms
|>
|>that values are the average obtained after the very first one,
|>on 20 execution.
|
|
| Most interesting. And the plans chosen with the 2 different default stat
| targets are the same? Sorry if I missed the post indicating they were.
|
| If the plans are the same, it would be interesting to get a profile on
| the 2 different cases with that index in place across 100k iterations of
| the prepared query.

Do you have an advice on the profiler to use ?


Regards
Gaetano Mendola



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBKHBg7UpzwH2SGd4RAmGCAKDOZ3xXNPFhhGSMN89MssR7UZnY3ACg6sAY
mWKo4uAZzv1ZtmBsfQZ2SBc=
=NQf/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----