Re: postgres uptime
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres uptime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4125B32C.4080406@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres uptime (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres uptime
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > >>Does anyone have any 'benefits' to implementing such a thing that we can >>list? The cons appear to be easy, what about pros? > > > That's exactly what's bugging me --- I have not seen any particularly > strong defense of why we *should* have this function. > > Your suggestion in another mail of restricting it to superusers would > eliminate most or all of the security gripes I'm raising. Whether that > still leaves it useful to the original suggestor's purpose, I dunno... If you had a pressing need, couldn't you just hack the startup script(s) to insert a timestamp in a suitable table? Or am I missing something here (as usual)? -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: