Re: pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables?
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41237FA7.50402@travelamericas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables? ("Glen Parker" <glenebob@nwlink.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump feature request: Exclude tables?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Glen Parker wrote: >>No, we have: >> >> * Allow pg_dump to use multiple -t and -n switches >> >> This should be done by allowing a '-t schema.table' syntax. >> >>but that doesn't have the exclude option. We had a patch that >>implemented an exclude but got confused over how it would interact with >>the schema switch and stuff. However, with the new '-t schema.table' >>syntax we might be able to get it working. >> >> > >Hmm, while you're at it, maybe you could make it accept wild >cards or regexp or something :-) That should allow you to toss >the -n parameter altogether (schema.*) if you wanted to. > >It would also be at least as good, IMO, to accept only one -t >option, re-defined as a comma-seperated list of names... And an >exlusion parameter defined the same way. > > > How would this interact with the shell? It seems like a supportability issue if we have to require single quotes around such arguments. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Metatron Technology Consulting
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: