Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4122.1222344886@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > Gevik Babakhani napsal(a): >> I have not investigated this yet. But I am very interested to know what the >> advantages would be to "upgrade" the code to C99 standards. > I think replace macros with inline functions. It brings to ability to > monitor them for example by DTrace. C99's definition of inline functions really sucks --- it's awkward to use, and essentially doesn't work at all for declaring inlines in header files, which would be the main use if we wanted to replace macros with inlines. I'm much happier using gcc's version of inline where we really need it (which is not that many places anyway). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: