Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>Rather I would ask why we changed the
>>description-loading routine in version 1.7 of initdb.c to use a copy
>>from file instead of what happens everywhere else where initdb loads the
>>file and feeds it to the postgres stdin?
>>
>>
>
>That was to avoid a Windows-only newline problem.  Don't complain too
>hard.
>
>

Well, I've tried to fix every newline problem I've come across - I
wasn't aware of this one.

>You are in any case missing the point: -L is a useless switch and there
>is no reason to make it easy to use.  (I don't think I have ever once
>had occasion to use it in all the years I've worked on Postgres, and I
>have certainly run initdb in orders-of-magnitude more contexts than any
>ordinary user would.)  If I have to waste any more time on this
>discussion, I will propose solving the problem by removing the switch
>entirely.
>
>
>
>
Sorry - I don't read -bugs so I haven't followed the discussion.

Removing it makes more sense to me, frankly.

cheers

andrew