Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 411D7086.30404@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>>However, I also believe that Mammoth Replicator would deserve equal >>mention, especially since Mammoth Replicator is more mature and they >>really are different products that serve a similar but not identical >>purpose. > > > So even though Slony is free and open source and Mammoth Replicator is > proprietary, you think we should give them equal mention? Yes. It is based on best tool for the job, not OSS versus non OSS. > > By that logic, if Powergres was based on 8.0 code, we would mention that > along with the Win32 port mention? That doesn't make sense to me. Yep. See above. > (Powergres is threaded so it would have some distinction compared to our > community Win32 implementation.) ] Yes, and if it was based on 8.0 code -- I would probably promote it over our implementation because it is threaded and in theory would perform better than our implementation. Obviously I would test and confirm. > Again, you make no distinction between propriety and free software, even > though our community is about free software, and not proprietary > software. That seem like a disconnect to me. Who says the community is all about free software? I don't know any GPLites in the community (o.k. I know a few, but they are the minority). I thought BSD was all about the best tool for the job? I use what tool works best for me and my customers. I started using PostgreSQL because it was better than MySQL (and still is). I started using Linux because I need a good OS for creating an ISP. I also use Xig which is closed source, because the X community doesn't come close to providing a competitive solution. I am about the overall promotion of PostgreSQL, which is why I am part of the advocacy group. Would I have a problem promoting a company if that company took PostgreSQL, closed sourced it, and never gave anything back? Absolutely that falls under ethics. Do I have a problem promoting SRA as a community member? Not in the least. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: