Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters

Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Oliver Jowett wrote:
> 
>> David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>> Dennis has pointed out that mixing the call-with-named-parameter
>>> interface with call-by-order-of-parameters one would cause confusion,
>>
>> Python's equivalent syntax allows you to mix the two forms so long as 
>> all the by-position parameters come first:
>>
> python don't have overloaded functions...

It doesn't change how you'd handle overloaded functions; you still have 
a type for every parameter available.

-O