Re: POSIX RE starting with a (
От | Nick Barr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POSIX RE starting with a ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 411A2D01.10909@chuckie.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | POSIX RE starting with a ( (Nick Barr <nicky@chuckie.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: POSIX RE starting with a (
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Nick Barr wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed something funny with the POSIX Regular expressions and > wondered if it is a bug, or whether I am doing something wrong. I am > using the POSIX RE in a function that is used in several places so would > have to put some nasty if statement in there for this side case if there > is not work around. > > ====================================================================== > intranet=# select track_id, track_name from ms_track where track_name > like '(%'; > track_id | track_name > ----------+--------------------------------- > 1294 | (I Can''t Get No) Satisfaction > 1340 | (Hidden Track) > 1503 | (Nice Dream) > 1942 | (I) Get Lost > (4 rows) > > intranet=# select track_name from ms_track where track_name ~ '^\('; > ERROR: invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced > intranet=# select track_name from ms_track where track_name ~ '^('; > ERROR: invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced > intranet=# select track_name from ms_track where track_name ~ '^\('; > ERROR: invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced > ====================================================================== > > Now I have tried a similar query using the PHP POSIX Regular Expressions > and it accepts the sequence '^\(' and matches correctly. Is this a > "feature" of PG that cannot be worked around easily? > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks > > Nick > > P.S. Thanks a lot guys for all the hard work on 8.0, looks good to me. > Lots of really useful features, PITR, Win32, Nested transactions. Good > work guys! Sorry should of said I am running PG 7.4.3. Nick
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: